Saturday, October 31, 2009

If Tom Harkin is sure….

"[Lieberman] still wants to be a part of the Democratic Party although he is a registered independent," Harkin said. "He wants to caucus with us and, of course, he enjoys his chairmanship of the [Homeland Security] committee because of the indulgence of the Democratic Caucus. So, I'm sure all of those things will cross his mind before the final vote."
...I'm, well, encouraged.

Hat tip to Josh Marshall.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

So long, Joe.

Senator Lieberman announces he will retire at the end of his current term.

Not in so many words, and not necessarily voluntarily, but it sounds like retirement to me.

Labels: , , , , ,

Opting in to "Opt-out."

I'm not too troubled by an opt-out compromise, for a variety of reasons. Neither is jnfr, who points out one of the best...
"... the politics of it are beautiful. Let the Republicans go home and tell their voters that they can't have health care for ideological reasons. I dare them to."
I double-dog dare 'em.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, October 08, 2009

Map of the day.

Via The Gavel...


We don't need a public option to compete with the free market, we need a public option to create a free market.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, October 03, 2009

From the "Since you asked…" file.

Skippy inquires
if you're on twitter (and who isn't?)…
Since you asked, me. I don't tweet. I don't text, either, or im. I blog.

If you, on the other hand, are a tweeter, you should certainly tweet john boehner @gopleader, and tell him you're an American who supports the public option, with the tag "#sickofit".

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, October 01, 2009

Chart of the day.

Via the Speaker...

Bigger? Sure, click away!


Labels: , , , ,

Friday, September 25, 2009

From the "When you put it that way…" file.

NYT-CBS News poll
"Would you favor or oppose the government offering everyone a government administered health insurance plan -- something like the Medicare coverage that people 65 and older get -- that would compete with private health insurance plans?"

Favor 65%
Oppose 26%

Labels: , , ,

Friday, September 18, 2009

Good question…

...from Paul Krugman...
How bad does a bill have to be to make it too bad to vote for?
The subject, of course, is health insurance reform, which is problematic to begin with. Nobody's really talking about health care at this point. That discussion would be about a single payer or national health plan. For folks like me, who believe that the private health insurance industry is a, if not the, central problem with our system today, all of the bills under serious consideration are "bad" bills to the degree that their central focus is preserving the private health insurance industry's profitability.

Perhaps an even better question is how good does a bill have to be to make it good enough to vote for? If the eventual bad bill includes elimination of pre-existing condition exclusions, lifetime maximums and cost-driven cancellations, it would be, at the least, a better than nothing bill. If the same bill includes a personal mandate without a public option, would it still be good enough, for the time being, at least, to vote for?

Probably. As an uninsured worker still seven years away from our current single payer for seniors health care system, I don't really expect to get any personal benefit from anything under current discussion. Any premium I might be able to afford, publicly or privately administered, would almost certainly include deductibles and co-pays that would make it essentially worthless to me. While some fret about the healthy young who would duck insurance costs without a mandate, the simple fact is that most of us who live without health insurance or health care do so simply because at the end of the month there's no money left for health expenses.

Sill, while I'm an advocate for replacement, rather than reform, of the current system, there's no doubt that even elementary reforms like those mentioned above would be a benefit to millions, if not to me.

So how bad does a bill have to be to make it too bad to vote for?

Worse than most anything we're hearing about so far, I'm afraid.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, August 31, 2009

Chart of the day.

Yes, yes, click it bigger.

We are the mainstream.

Hat tip to McJoan.

Labels: , ,

Friday, August 21, 2009

Quote of the day.

Speaker Pelosi
"There is no way I can pass a bill in the House of Representatives without a public option."
Good. The only thing worse than no bill would be a private mandate without a public option.

Labels: , , , ,