Saturday, December 10, 2011

Notice anything missing?

Via Meteor Blades...
In California, supporters of abolishing the death penalty have gathered hundreds of thousands of signatures to place a measure on the November ballot, while activists and lawmakers in Maryland, Kansas, Ohio and Connecticut are gearing up for legislative battles in their states.
Why not Washington?

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, November 09, 2011

What if they had an election…

…and our side won? Won a bunch. All over the place.

Like I said, yesterday was a good one for the good guys.

Key Republican issues and political strategies took hits from coast to coast. Voter suppression? Maine offered the first blow for liberty of the day, restoring the same-day voter registration that Republican legislators had taken from them. Mississippi, of all places, scored a hat trick of sorts, setting back the Republican anti-science, anti-choice and anti-woman agendas when they rejected Amendment 26, which would have granted "personhood" to embryos.

Republican ant-unionism was dealt a critical blow by Ohio voters, with 82 of 88 counties rejecting Gov. John Kasich's attack on public-sector workers right to organize and bargain collectively. Republican anti-immigrant champion Russell Pearse, President of the State Senate, was removed in a recall election after sponsoring legislation that provided a blueprint for devastation of agriculture in several states. (Another noteworthy Arizona outcome - both Tucson and Phoenix have Democratic Mayors for the first time in decades.)

Here in the upper left, voters approved stronger training and regulation requirements for home health care workers, took the state out of the retail liquor business (a probably good thing accomplished in a highly dubious fashion) and, so far, are rejecting Tim Eyman's effort to cripple our transportation infrastructure.

Our local elections have turned out to be a pretty status quo affair. Where the results are clear, they're clearly in favor of incumbents for the most part.

Sherril Huff will continue as King County Director of Elections with over 75% of the vote against a patently unqualified challenger. Port Commissioner Gael Tarleton has a margin of 33,000 votes over her opponent, but apparently won't be joined by fellow reformer Dean Willard, who trails incumbent Bill Bryant by a margin of 37% to 62%.

Here in Shoreline, that pro-incumbency trend holds, with City Councilmembers Chris Eggen and Doris McConnell having margins of over 60% after the second day of ballot counting. I'm afraid that means my friend Janet Way won't be returning to the Council, but the Janet I know is indefatigable, and it won't be long before she sets her eyes on a new target for her effective activism.

In the open seat for Shoreline City Council, Jesse Salomon is less than 500 votes behind former Planning Commissioner Robin McClelland, still too close to call in my view.

Our School Board incumbents, Mike Jacobs and Richard Potter, appear safe at this point.

After the Huff/Greene and Willard/Bryant races, the campaign that brought generated the most search engine interest according to my logs was for our local sewer service, the Ronald Wastewater District. Bob Ransom, a fixture in local politics for decades and a former School Board member and City Councilmember, took on longtime sewer commissioner Arne Lind, largely over the question of whether and how the city should absorb the district. Ransom says it's time, and that it can be done administratively. Lind is not so sure, and favors a public vote before any change is made. Ransom, with an overwhelming advantage in name recognition, is leading by a scant 311 votes in another race I won't be ready to call for a while.

So what happened where you are?

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, October 10, 2011

He's not Joe, he's not a plumber…

…and he's not going to beat Marcy Kaptur.

Heck, he's not even entertaining anymore.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, March 14, 2011

I know that the First Amendment...

…doesn't specifically mention Governors, but this still sounds outrageous, not to mention illegal...
Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R) is a public official accountable to taxpayers. But he is demanding a news blackout tomorrow when he releases the state’s budget plan. Kasich has forbidden reporters to broadcast any videos, photos or audio recordings during or after his afternoon budget briefing for the press.
The Ohio press corps should show up with every recording device they can find and force him to try to enforce that demand.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

I mean, who needs Sarah…

…when there's a Boehner boner just laying there?
When U.S. House Minority Leader John Boehner told a newscaster Sunday that not a single stimulus-funded road contract in his home state of Ohio had been let, he was wrong.

The Ohio Department of Transportation has OK'd 52 stimulus-funded road and bridge projects at a cost of nearly $84 million.... An ODOT spokesman called Boehner's statement "disappointing."

And Scott Varner noted that ODOT had just OK'd six more stimulus road projects which will cost about $43 million.
Can he even find Ohio on a map anymore?

Hat tip to Steve Benen.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 05, 2008

Really?

Jerome Armstrong…
Obama has a huge electability problem in the state. He took a total of 5 counties, and lost in 82 counties...You don't win a general election in Ohio if you can only win in 5 counties.
I mean, I've got to admit, the map's pretty impressive…



…but couldn't it just as well be said that Hillary Clinton has a huge electability problem in a state where she can't win the five counties that contain more than half the state's population?

It's the same thing as those US maps showing those huge patches of red covering the 'empty' states. Hillary's 82 counties have fewer citizens combined than Barack's five.

Of course, it doesn’t say much about how either might fare against John McCain in November, which is, or should be, a far different dynamic. That is, unless the argument is that the March Clinton and the November McCain will be indistinguishable to the Democratic regulars that provided most of Clinton's margin. Or are we supposed to believe the well has been so poisoned that none of Clinton's support is transferable? That most of it isn't? And why, I wonder, might that be?

What's more likely is that she's likely to do better in Columbus and Obama's likely to do better in the hinterlands than this map shows. In other words, the probability is that Clinton will be a lot more popular in Cincinnati and Obama will take a lot more than five counties come November. If anything, Obama's edge with wayward R's and independents is something Clinton's less likely to replicate in the fall, creating an electablity issue of another kind.

Labels: , , , ,

It's not about winning states...

...it's about winning delegates. The latest delegate allocation from MSNBC...
Ohio

Clinton 73
Obama 62

Rhode Island

Clinton 13
Obama 8

Texas (Primary)

Clinton 46
Obama 34

Texas (Caucus)

Clinton 0
Obama 0

Vermont

Obama 9
Clinton 6
A net pick up of 25 for Clinton at this point, with a less encouraging result expected from the Texas caucuses. Once again, the Clinton camp knew there was a caucus involved, they just didn't know what to do about it.

At any rate, with Obama going into the night with a lead of 122 pledged delegates (MSNBC numbers again), +25, give or take, isn't going to get the job done. I don't know if Hillary can pull of a win, but I'm pretty sure she can't pull one off a clean one.

Still, this is more than the encouragement she was looking for to press on. Duck and cover.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Me too.

Citing a USA Today poll showing that Democrats expect Obama to be the nominee, regardless of their preferences, PSOTD responds...
I get the sense that we're now in the final countdown - and that next Tuesday will become the end of the race. I think this survey suggests that a majority of voters actually WANT that to be the case - that they are ready for a break from the harsh heat of this primary season, and are ready for different distractions than primary politics for the near term. I think this would be the case regardless of who was leading at this point, and will work strongly against Hillary Clinton next week.
Me too.

Only a strong performance by Obama can bring this thing to an end on Wednesday. If he wins Texas and finishes within, say, 5% in Ohio, with a few CD wins to boost his delegate count, there'll be a landslide of endorsements from labor, PLEOs, Clinton staffers will close the oppo files and start working on resumes. The Obama-McCain race will be underway.

Should Clinton win Texas and Ohio, or lose Texas and win Ohio commandingly, well, if you like what we're getting out of the campaigns now, you're gonna love Pennsylvania.

Labels: , , , , , ,