I guess the reason…

…the Clintons have such a piss-poor caucus record is they really don't know anything about them. The Big Dog...

"The caucuses aren't good for her. They disproportionately favor upper-income voters who, who, don't really need a president but feel like they need a change."

Actually, they favor the folks who live in the neighborhood. Upper-income voters are scarce in my precinct, and plentiful in others, I suppose, but the concentration of delegates is based on Democratic ballot performance, and that tends to proportionately disfavor upper-income neighborhoods most everywhere.

What I still don't get is why their entire campaign operation chooses to be willfully ignorant of the process and possibilities of the caucus system despite getting their butts whipped over and over again. Caucus organizing is different from primary organizing, and it's hard work, but it's not all that hard to figure out.

And we all need a president. And a change.