Tuesday, January 03, 2006

What was it…

…that brought down Duke Cunningham again? Oh, yeah, bribery
23. In exchange for these things of value, from in or about March 2000 through in or about April 2004, defendant ABRAMOFF, Scanlon and others, together and separately, sought and received Representative # 1's agreement to perform a series of official acts to benefit defendant ABRAMOFF's clients, and advancing the application of a client of defendant ABRAMOFF for a license to install wireless telephone infrastructure in the House of Representatives.
Representative #1. The once and future indictee?

Yeah or Ney?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home